家庭护理评估量表的汉化和信效度检验

定期进行家庭评估，检查和谐程度 #生活乐趣# #家庭乐趣# #和谐家庭氛围#

摘要：

目的 翻译国际居民评估工具家庭护理评估量表（International Resident Assessment Instrument Home Care,InterRAI Home Care）,简称InterRAI家庭护理评估量表,并对中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表的信效度进行检验。方法 采用Beaton简洁六步法对InterRAI家庭护理评估量表进行翻译和跨文化调试,形成中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表。采用便利取样法,选取在北京市东城区6所社区卫生服务中心门诊就诊、符合纳入标准的老年患者215例,使用中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表和改良巴氏指数量表、改良工具性日常生活能力量表、简易精神状态检查量表对社区居家老年人进行评估。 结果 中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表总的Cronbach’s α系数为0.871,量表平均内容效度为1.00,评定者间信度为0.916~0.942。中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表的ADL维度与改良巴氏指数量表每个条目的Pearson相关系数为 -0.999~-0.810;工具性日常生活能力维度与改良工具性日常生活能力量表的每个条目的Pearson相关系数为-0.996~-0.962;触发认知能力问题与MMSE量表评分判断认知障碍的一致性系数为100%;使用中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估系统所触发的问题与医生诊断间的一致性是100%。结论 中文版InterRAI家庭护理评估量表在社区居家老年人群体中具有良好的信效度,量表的稳定性好、可靠性高,可以在我国社区居家老年人群体中使用。

关键词: 家庭护理评估量表, 护理评估, 社区保健护理, 老年人身心健康评价, 老年护理学

Abstract:

Objective To translate the English version of InterRAI Home Care into the Chinese version and to evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods The translation and culturally adaptation of InterRAI Home Care were performed to construct the Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care. Using the convenience sampling,215 subjects who met eligibility criteria were recruited from community health care centers of Dongcheng District,Beijing. We used the Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care,Modified Barthel Index scale,Modified IADL scale,and Mini-Mental State Examination scale to assess the elderly. Results The Cronbach’s α of Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care was 0.871 which confirmed the internal consistency. The I-CVI was 1.0 for all items,and the S-CVI was also 1.0. The inter-rater reliability was confirmed by Pearson correlation coefficient which ranged from 0.916 to 0.942. The criterion-related validity was established by Pearson correlation coefficients which ranged from -0.999 to -0.810 between scores of the ADL and Modified Barthel Index scale. The criterion-related validity was established by Pearson correlation coefficients which ranged from -0.996 to -0.962 between scores of the IADL and Modified IADL scale. The criterion-related validity was established by correlation coefficient of 1.0 between cognitive disorder of CAPs and MMSE scale. The agreement coefficient was 1.0 between CAPs and doctors’ diagnoses. Conclusion The Chinese version of InterRAI Home Care was demonstrated to be reliable and valid among community dwelling elderly.

Key words: Assessment Instrument Home Care, Nursing Assessment, Community Health Nursing, Geriatric Assessment, Geriatric Nursing

网址：家庭护理评估量表的汉化和信效度检验 https://klqsh.com/news/view/265109

相关内容

基于家庭护理的儿童哮喘管理策略及其效果评估
家庭和谐量表的编制和信效度验证
青少年体育活动乐趣量表（PACES）中文版修订与信效度检验
中文版工作家庭平衡量表的信效度研究
学生发展趋势评估测验量表(SDTAS)在线测试
社会适应能力评估量表
家庭护理人员的职责和技能有哪些？如何选择合适的护理人员？
居家护理中的有效措施与技巧.docx
居家养老护理计划全面解析——从评估到执行
家庭护理一般护理知识.ppt

随便看看